Bibliographic record
Abstract
HoI'photography exhibit months bcforc secing it.CBC Radio was intcrvicwing the cxhibition's curator in thc spring, and it \vas August by thc timc I was next in the Outaouais area able to visit the Museum of Civilization.The curator, Faith Moosang, spoke lively about C. D. Hoy, rcvcaling hcr excitemcnt over the photographs and her ability to present thcm to Canadians.Hoy, who emigrated from China in the carly 1900s at the age ofscvcnteen.was a local merchant and the first professional portrait photographer in post gold rush interior British Columbia.He came to Canada because, as the firstborn son of his poor family, he had to find a way to support them.The way in which the curator spoke about the exhibit, her descriptions of thc honcsty and simplicity of Hoy's imagcs, and thc hardships and pcrseverancc of bcing a photographcr at that timc. in that contcxt.pcaked my curiosity.Yct, I fclt unfulfillcd aftcr going to the cxhibit.It was not Hoy's imagcs that madc me fccl this way: his images arc rich and fascinating.Rathcr it was the coldncss and simplicity ofthc display in gencral that left mc wanting morc.What initially bothcrcd mc was the location of the exhibit decp in thc bowels of thc muscum.The Muscum of Civilization was not the original vcnue for thc exhibition, and its final home will bc in Hoy's community of Barkcrville, British Columbia.Howcvcr. the fact that this museum is accustomcd 10 travclling cxhibits, I cxpected bcttcr visibility and directions.It took Illy husband and I a lengthy bout of confused Illaze walking bcfore we finally found a poster about thc exhibit (this was the first advcrtiscment we had come across in thc muscum about thc display, and it was hiddcn bchind somc cscalators).The arrow on the postcr further led us along twisting corridors and (bamingly) cmpty rooms bcforc scttling us at our dcstination.Thc imagcs wcrc housed in a roolll that was largc and bright cnough to
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".