The Culture Cult. Designer Tribalism and Other Essays. (Book Reviews/Comptes Rendus)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sandall, Roger. The Culture Cult. Designer Tribalism and Other Essays. Boulder: Westview Press, 2001, 214 pp. This is a book which is at times polemical, entertaining and insightful, at others superficial, simplistic and frustrating. The very structure book is somewhat confusing: subtitle suggests a collection essays (whose connection is indeed at times tenuous), but book is arranged as a continuous sequence parts and chapters which suggest a coherent argument. Sandall, prior to his retirement an anthropologist at University Sydney, Australia, criticizes what he sees as romantic primitivism in anthropology and other social sciences which conjures up images or ethnic cultures that are often deliberately simplified and carefully cleansed all negative characteristics. Designer tribalism contends that all cultures stand on same plane. Traditional cultures are not only not inferior but offer valuable lessons for modern society: their communal ways, egalitarian social structures, and harmony with environment are presented as solutions for modern social and environmental ills. Sandall responds with an unqualified defence modernity. Many traditional societies are in fact inferior. Communal life and egalitarian structures are more often than not developmental dead ends. The history many early societies is a history tyranny, violence and environmental devastation. In Sandall's words the garden human cultures contains as many stink-lilies as violets, strangling vines as primroses, sick societies as those with rosy cheeks -- and too many problems in modern world come from sentimentally denying this fact. The benign image traditional societies promoted by cult is in fact a synthetic mix genuine and invented fictionalized pasts, used by aboriginal ideologues and their non-native allies for political expediency and personal gain. What is worse, political decisions based on such culturally justified false beliefs condemn contemporary cultures to economic and social stagnation. The pre-1970s policies trying to help them overcome their backwar dness through creative destruction have given way to policies which maintain indigenous identity through psychological and moral reconciliation which does little more than rejig public mind, ask leading political figures to adopt a contrite demeanor and apologize for sins history. This may have considerable political appeal, but is often counterproductive: Sandall argues that Australian aborigines who have assimilated have made impressive gains, while those who were victims anti-assimilationist policies embraced and promoted by idealistic middle-class whites in south have seen their literacy levels fall, experienced deteriorating health, and have suffered from administrative waste and corruption. The handover education, policing and health care to native self-administration has merely assured that development has passed them, a fact that is covered up by mandatory silence imposed by political correctness: no one dares say a thing. Sandal maintains that there is a big ditch, a threshold modernity which must be crossed if backward societies are to catch up with three principal achievements modern society: a democratic political system, an independent judiciary, and a market economy. Democracy was discovered in early Greece. It was strengthened by gradual emergence an independent legal system and market capitalism in Europe and America and then spread around globe. These changes represent a universal adaptive process, and are a fundamental prerequisite for social and economic progress. Sandall traces intellectual origins cult to Rousseau's noble savage and Herder's view that each culture is of literally inestimable value in its own society, and consequently to humanity as a whole. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.079 | 0.049 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".