MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W109988031

The Culture Cult. Designer Tribalism and Other Essays. (Book Reviews/Comptes Rendus)

2003· article· en· W109988031 on OpenAlex
Bernd Baldus

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCrafts, Textile, and Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTribalismCultSociologyHarmony (color)Harmony with natureModernityArgument (complex analysis)AestheticsLawPhilosophyArtPolitical scienceVisual arts
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sandall, Roger. The Culture Cult. Designer Tribalism and Other Essays. Boulder: Westview Press, 2001, 214 pp. This is a book which is at times polemical, entertaining and insightful, at others superficial, simplistic and frustrating. The very structure book is somewhat confusing: subtitle suggests a collection essays (whose connection is indeed at times tenuous), but book is arranged as a continuous sequence parts and chapters which suggest a coherent argument. Sandall, prior to his retirement an anthropologist at University Sydney, Australia, criticizes what he sees as romantic primitivism in anthropology and other social sciences which conjures up images or ethnic cultures that are often deliberately simplified and carefully cleansed all negative characteristics. Designer tribalism contends that all cultures stand on same plane. Traditional cultures are not only not inferior but offer valuable lessons for modern society: their communal ways, egalitarian social structures, and harmony with environment are presented as solutions for modern social and environmental ills. Sandall responds with an unqualified defence modernity. Many traditional societies are in fact inferior. Communal life and egalitarian structures are more often than not developmental dead ends. The history many early societies is a history tyranny, violence and environmental devastation. In Sandall's words the garden human cultures contains as many stink-lilies as violets, strangling vines as primroses, sick societies as those with rosy cheeks -- and too many problems in modern world come from sentimentally denying this fact. The benign image traditional societies promoted by cult is in fact a synthetic mix genuine and invented fictionalized pasts, used by aboriginal ideologues and their non-native allies for political expediency and personal gain. What is worse, political decisions based on such culturally justified false beliefs condemn contemporary cultures to economic and social stagnation. The pre-1970s policies trying to help them overcome their backwar dness through creative destruction have given way to policies which maintain indigenous identity through psychological and moral reconciliation which does little more than rejig public mind, ask leading political figures to adopt a contrite demeanor and apologize for sins history. This may have considerable political appeal, but is often counterproductive: Sandall argues that Australian aborigines who have assimilated have made impressive gains, while those who were victims anti-assimilationist policies embraced and promoted by idealistic middle-class whites in south have seen their literacy levels fall, experienced deteriorating health, and have suffered from administrative waste and corruption. The handover education, policing and health care to native self-administration has merely assured that development has passed them, a fact that is covered up by mandatory silence imposed by political correctness: no one dares say a thing. Sandal maintains that there is a big ditch, a threshold modernity which must be crossed if backward societies are to catch up with three principal achievements modern society: a democratic political system, an independent judiciary, and a market economy. Democracy was discovered in early Greece. It was strengthened by gradual emergence an independent legal system and market capitalism in Europe and America and then spread around globe. These changes represent a universal adaptive process, and are a fundamental prerequisite for social and economic progress. Sandall traces intellectual origins cult to Rousseau's noble savage and Herder's view that each culture is of literally inestimable value in its own society, and consequently to humanity as a whole. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it