MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Caregivers’ treatment-seeking behaviors and practices in Uganda—A systematic review (Part II)

2015· review· en· W1100240134 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Tropica · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalariaGovernment (linguistics)ArtemisininMedicineCase managementPopularityBest practicePlasmodium falciparumEnvironmental healthFamily medicinePsychiatryPsychologyPolitical scienceImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prompt treatment with artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) remains the cornerstone for managing uncomplicated malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum. In accordance with global initiatives to curb malaria, the Ugandan government pledged to increase the proportion of children under five to receive the first-line antimalarial treatment to 85% by 2010. To achieve this, Uganda has implemented several initiatives to improve prompt access to ACTs. While several studies have evaluated various aspects of caregivers' treatment-seeking and its impact on malaria management in children since the advent of ACT, this is the first systematic review to synthesize the Uganda literature since 2004. A comprehensive search employed key web search engines databases. A total of 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. This review found that although most Ugandans associate mosquitoes with malaria, misconceptions about the cause of malaria is common. Home management continues to be a common first response, with most caregivers seeking subsequent treatment if the child does not improve. A major concern arising from this review was that an increase in ACT knowledge does not always translate into a child receiving an ACT. While 84% of caregivers in a recent national study spontaneously named ACT as the antimalarial of choice, only half of the children were reported to have received an antimalarial and only 44% received an ACT. As with ACT usage, prompt use of ACT fell significantly short of the 2010 target. Given the on-going popularity of home management, future research is needed to examine the diversity and adequacy of home management for malaria and the sequence of care provided from the moment of recognition of initial symptoms. Considering the pervasive use of polypharmacy to manage malaria, further research is needed to quantify the proportion of children who receive an appropriate antimalarial - defined as receiving only the first-line treatment. Finally, given children's reliance on caregivers to seek out appropriate care on their behalf, future studies need to examine specific assets and challenges influencing caregivers' treatment-seeking behaviors in order to positively influence decision-making at the household level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it