MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W110328050

On Deuber's partition theorem for (m, p, c)-sets.

2002· article· en· W110328050 on OpenAlexaffvenue
David S. Gunderson

Bibliographic record

VenueArs Combinatoria · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicLimits and Structures in Graph Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsPartition (number theory)Van der Waerden's theoremCombinatoricsConjectureDiscrete mathematicsGraph
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1973, Deuber published his famous proof of Rado’s conjecture regarding partition regular sets. In his proof, he invented structures called (m, p, c)-sets and gave a partition theorem for them based on repeated applications of van der Waerden’s theorem on arithmetic progressions. In this paper, we give the complete proof of Deuber’s, however with the more recent parameter set proof of his partition result for (m, p, c)-sets. We then adapt this parameter set proof to show that for any k,m, p, c, every Kk-free graph on the positive integers contains an (m, p, c)-set, each of whose rows are independent sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArs CombinatoriaSame topicLimits and Structures in Graph TheoryFrench-language works237,207