MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W110545049

Los transgénicos en la harina

2002· article· es· W110545049 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
María Carmen Moros

Bibliographic record

VenueMolinería y panadería: Revista profesional de panadería y pastelería · 2002
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetically Modified Organisms Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aunque el trigo transgenico no se comercializa aun en Europa, de America del Norte (Estados Unidos y Canada) llegan partidas de trigo mezcladas con maiz y soja OMG (Organismos Modificados Geneticamente), lo que explica que en las harineras, a pesar de hacerse una seleccion y limpieza previa a la molienda, granos de maiz y soja modificados geneticamente acaben mezclandose con los trigos de una partida que estuvo en contacto con ellos. Existen una serie de protocolos, normalizados por la Union Europea, para determinar si un producto es transgenico o no y el porcentaje de su ADN que ha sido modificado. En este articulo, nuestra colaboradora explica estos metodos de analisis y el porcentaje de sensibilidad que poseen. El trigo OMG puede ser una realidad en la proxima campana, ya que todo hace suponer que Estados Unidos, Canada e, incluso Argentina, se recolecten los primeros granos OMG durante este ano. Su llegada a Europa, mientras no se levante la moratoria para mas productos OMG, no puede producirse en teoria, pero seguramente existira el problema de partidas mezcladas de trigos OMG y no modificados. El harinero debera, pues, estar alertado.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolinería y panadería: Revista profesional de panadería y pasteleríaSame topicGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchFrench-language works237,207