MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Efficacy Of a Pharmacokinetics-Directed IV Busulfan (Bu), Plus Cyclophosphamide (Cy) and Etoposide (E) Preparative Regimen With Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation For Lymphoma: Final Report Of a Multi-Center Phase 2 Study In North America

2013· article· en· W110982080 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christopher R. Flowers, Michael Lill, Luciano J. Costa, Tsiporah B. Shore, William P. Vaughan, Michael Craig, César O. Freytes, Thomas C. Shea, Mitchell E. Horwitz, Joseph W. Fay, Shin Mineishi, Damiano Rondelli, James R. Mason, Vijay Reddy, Ira Braunschweig, Weiyun Z. Ai, Elizabeth Armstrong, Angela Smith, Cathy Zhao, Agnes Elekes, Kazunobu Kato, Edmund K. Waller

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineRegimenTransplantationBusulfanSurgeryInternational Prognostic IndexHematopoietic stem cell transplantationEtoposideAutologous stem-cell transplantationOncologySingle CenterCyclophosphamideGastroenterologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Bu-based conditioning regimens are commonly used prior to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for lymphoma, but clinical results of an intravenous (IV) Bu-based regimen have been limited to single center studies. This multi-center, single-arm, Phase 2 study prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of the IV BuCyE regimen in lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT. Methods The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), transplant-related mortality (TRM) and overall response rate. TRM was defined as a death after transplant due to any cause other than disease progression. Subjects underwent first ASCT for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that relapsed after initial therapy, was initially refractory to an anthracycline-based chemotherapy, or for high-risk NHL histology in first complete remission (CR) [International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of 4-5, or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)]. Eligible subjects achieved CR or partial remission (PR) following salvage chemotherapy. The study initially enrolled subjects of 18-80 years, but the protocol was amended to reduce the upper age limit to 65 years due to a high TRM rate at post-transplant 100 days for the subjects >65 years. Therefore, we report safety for all the subjects undergoing ASCT (n=203) and efficacy from those 65 years old or younger (n=186). IV Bu doses were individually adjusted based on pre-conditioning test PK results; the area under the concentration-time curve of Bu was targeted to 20,000 mM*min. Bu was given as a 3-hour infusion once daily from Days -8 through Day -5. E (1.4 g/m2) was administered on Day -4, followed by 2.5 g/m2/day of Cy on Days -3 and -2. Results A total of 207 subjects with HL (n=66) or NHL (n=141) were enrolled from 32 centers in the US and Canada between February 2010 and April 2012. Four subjects did not proceed with ASCT due to insurance or eligibility issues; the remaining 203 underwent ASCT. The final TRM rates at Day 100 for all subjects (n=203), for those older than 65 year old (n=17), and for those 65 years old or younger (n=186) were 4.5% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.1-8.3%), 23.5% (95% CI; 6.8-49.9%) and 2.7% (95% CI: 0.9-6.2%), respectively. The most common grade (Gr) 3 or 4 adverse events (CTCAE v3.0) observed from Day -8 through Day 100 were febrile neutropenia (Gr 3: 58.1%; Gr 4: 3.0%), stomatitis (Gr 3: 40.9%; no Gr 4), nausea (Gr 3: 8.9%; no Gr 4), and hypophosphatemia (Gr 3:6.9%; Gr 4: 1.0%). There was no instance of seizure or hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) meeting the Baltimore criteria. Efficacy was analyzed for 186 subjects ≤65 years old with HL (n=65) or NHL (n=121), which included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n=63), MCL (n=29) and follicular lymphoma (FL; n=23). The median age was 49 year old (range: 19-65); 36 % were female, 87% were white, 76% had a Karnofsky Score ≥90. Majority of the patients had CR2 or higher, or PR at transplant except that 19 MCL patients and three DLBCL patients with IPI score 4 had CR1. In addition, five patients (3 for NHL; 2 for HL) who had refractory disease to initial chemotherapy and required salvage therapy to achieve CR1 also enrolled this study. With median 20 months follow-up, the estimated 2-year PFS was 33% for HL and 58%, 77%, and 43% for DLBCL, MCL, and FL respectively [Fig. 1]. The estimated 2-year OS was 76% for HL and 65%, 89%, and 89% for DLBCL, MCL, and FL respectively [Fig. 2 ]. Conclusions IV BuCyE regimen provided good early disease control with acceptable safety profiles in B-cell NHL lymphoma patients 65 year old or younger, but there were early declines in PFS in HL patients. Additional comparisons of PFS and OS from the BuCyE regimen with a pre-specified, matched-control group of approximately 800 matched cases (1:4 ratio) obtained from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry data who received carmustine, E, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) conditioning regimen are underway, and updated results will be presented. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide and VP-16 for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Costa:Otsuka: Research Funding. Freytes:Otsuka America Pharmaceutical: Research Funding, Travel funds for scientific presentation Other. Armstrong:Otsuka: Employment. Smith:Otsuka Pharmacetical Development & Commercialization: Employment. Elekes:Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Employment. Kato:Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc: Employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→