A bilobed groin flap for coverage of traumatic injury to both the volar and dorsal hand surfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are many methods available for coverage of both the volar and dorsal hand surfaces in traumatic injury. All of these surgical procedures allow for ample coverage of the defect, but have the major drawback of needing multiple donor sites. In the present report, a case of a complex crush injury to the hand in which both volar and dorsal surfaces received traumatic injury is presented. A bilobed groin flap pedicled on the superficial circumflex iliac artery was fashioned to cover the entire defect. Like many other described flaps, the bilobed groin flap resulted in a favourable functional and cosmetic result for the patient, but with the unique advantage of requiring a single donor site. METHODS: A bipedicled groin flap was raised from distal to proximal, and the flaps inset onto both the dorsal and volar hand defects. RESULTS: The patient regained adequate function of his hand, and was able to return to work full-time as a manual labourer. CONCLUSION: The bilobed groin flap appears to be a valuable option for covering complex hand injuries involving both the volar and dorsal surfaces of the hand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".