MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W11151609

Cyclical Recovery Continuing

2004· article· en· W11151609 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas Url

Bibliographic record

VenueWIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGerman Economic Analysis & Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflation (cosmology)UnemploymentOptimismBusiness cycleEconomicsUnemployment rateQuarter (Canadian coin)Work (physics)Point (geometry)Index (typography)Order (exchange)Labour economicsPercentage pointDemographic economicsMonetary economicsMacroeconomicsEngineeringFinancePsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Production expectations in Austrian manufacturing are stabilising, and cautious optimism is confirming the business cycle recovery. Construction activity has recently been lacking strength, although firms' judgements on their order levels point to a rebound in the months to come. Retail sales are still held back by weak consumer confidence, but here too a tentative pick-up has become visible at the end of the first quarter. In May, the year-on-year increase in unemployment narrowed for the first time, with the number of young and of older people out of work even declining. Since employment expanded, the rate of unemployment remained unchanged from one year ago. The rate of inflation (HICP) stayed constant at 1.5 percent in April, but higher energy prices are likely to push the index up in May.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports)Same topicGerman Economic Analysis & PoliciesFrench-language works237,207