A MODEL FOR PREDICTING THE TRAJECTORY OF A LIQUID JET IN A SUBSONIC GASEOUS CROSSFLOW
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an approach for modeling a liquid jet trajectory in a subsonic gaseous crossflow. Forces acting on the liquid column including drag, gravitation, surface tension, and viscosity are all accounted for along with the mass and energy conservation equations which are employed to model the liquid jet trajectory. The tangential and normal components of the governing equations are solved analytically using control-volume analysis. A novel correlation in a sinusoidal-exponential functional form is developed as a function of the momentum flux ratio, gas and jet Weber number, jet Reynolds number, and Bond number. This correlation is capable of predicting jet trajectory of different liquids in a subsonic crossflow at different operating conditions and injection angles. The predictions showed reasonable agreement with published experimental data and empirical correlations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it