MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W112228810 · doi:10.36744/kf.2768

Kto polubi Mary Lennox? „Tajemniczy ogród” Agnieszki Holland i współczesne kino familijne

2013· article· pl· W112228810 on OpenAlexaff
Elżbieta Ostrowska-Chmura

Bibliographic record

VenueKwartalnik Filmowy · 2013
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolish Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tajemniczy ogród (The Secret Garden, 1993), pierwszy film zrealizowany przez Agnieszkę Holland w Hollywood, jest adaptacją powieści Frances Hodgson Burnett powszechnie uznawanej za klasykę literatury dziecięcej. Autorka artykułu twierdzi, że film ten jest efektem różnorodnych negocjacji między różnymi modelami i tradycjami estetycznymi kina – głównie hollywoodzkiego kina familijnego oraz europejskiego kina artystycznego. W pierwszej części artykułu omówiony jest kontekst produkcyjny Tajemniczego ogrodu i jego wpływ na ostateczny kształt artystyczny filmu. Następnie przedmiotem analizy jest kategoria kina familijnego, do której film Holland jest zaliczany. W części analitycznej artykułu autorka szczegółowo analizuje sekwencje początkową i końcową filmu, by na ich przykładzie omówić proces negocjacji estetycznych i ideologicznych.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKwartalnik FilmowySame topicPolish Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207