"Backdaire": Chinatown as cultural site in fae myenne ng's bone and Wayson Choy's "The jade peony"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEste ensayo analiza la representacion del barrio chino en las novelas Bone, de Fae Myenne Ng, y The Jade Peony del escritor chino-canadiense Wayson Choy como un espacio multicultural y multitracial rico y complejo. “Chinatown” siempre ha ocupado un papel predominante en la literatura asiatica-americana, como un sitio para la reconstruccion y la transmision de la cultura nacional originaria, y como un lugar importante para la comunicacion intercultural. Ng y Choy definen las fronteras de Chinatown en terminos que sugieren movimiento y variaciones constantes, apuntando asi hacia un momento clave en la construccion de la subjetividad asiatica-americana y rearticulando las propias nociones de espacio, pertenencia y bagaje cultural para los americanos y canadienses de origen chino. En estas novelas, se da un cruce de fronteras a muchos niveles, creando un complejo de relaciones que ayudan a describir Chinatown como enclave unico para una subjetividad en evolucion. EnglishThis essay will analyze the representations of Chinatown as a complexly multi-layered cultural space in Fae Myenne Ng’s Bone and Chinese Canadian Wayson Choy’s The Jade Peony. Chinatown has occupied an important place in Asian American writing, as the site for a reconstitution and retransmission of originary national culture, as well as a location for important cross-cultural communication. Ng and Choy formulate the borders of Chinatown in terms that suggest movement and continual shifts, signaling a critical junction in the workings of Asian American subjectivity and rearticulating the very notions of space, belonging, and heritage for Chinese Americans and Chinese Canadians. Borders are crossed in these novels on many levels, creating a complex network of relationships that help define or describe Chinatown as a unique cultural site for evolving subjectivities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".