MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1124372794 · doi:10.1128/9781555818395.ch4

Host Receptors of Bacterial Origin

2014· book-chapter· en· W1124372794 on OpenAlexaff
Calvin K. Yip, Cecilia Chiu, N.C.J. Strynadka

Bibliographic record

VenueASM Press eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEscherichia coli research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntiminBiologyBacterial adhesinMicrobiologyBacterial outer membraneReceptorPathogenicity islandOperonBacteriaEscherichia coliEnteropathogenic Escherichia coliGeneticsCell biologyGeneEnterobacteriaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter illustrates how specific pathogenic bacteria participate in a sophisticated cross talk with their host by highlighting recent advances in the understanding of the structure and function of the first identified host receptor of bacterial origin—the translocated intimin receptor (Tir) from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and its cognate adhesin intimin. EPEC, an extracellular bacterial pathogen which infects humans by colonizing the intestinal mucosa, is a major cause of infantile diarrhea in developing countries and continues to be a major health threat worldwide. The locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE)5/Tir operon contains three important genes directly involved in the intimate attachment of bacteria to host: eae, which encodes the outer membrane adhesion molecule known as intimin; tir, which encodes the translocated intimin receptor (Tir); and cesT, which encodes the type III chaperone of Tir. Recent structural and biochemical studies have provided further insights into the molecular details of the Tir-intimin interaction with respect to intimate attachment; and this chapter reviews some of these aspects. Since the discovery of EPEC Tir, bacterially derived receptors have been identified only in the attaching and effacing (A/E) family of pathogens, and all of them are Tir orthologues. It is still puzzling why similar types of receptors have not been identified in other bacterial pathogens. The chapter speculates that a number of reasons contribute to the difficulty in identifying other receptors of bacterial origin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASM Press eBooksSame topicEscherichia coli research studiesFrench-language works237,207