MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1125460305

Основные направления внешней политики Канады в 1984-1993 гг. (по материалам архива внешней политики РФ)

2013· article· ru· W1125460305 on OpenAlex
Бабаев Эльчин Азизович

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Filologiya · 2013
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeign policyInternational tradeGovernment (linguistics)PoliticsFree tradePolitical scienceCommercial policyNegotiationEuropean unionInternational free trade agreementSettlement (finance)EconomyEconomicsLawFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The foreign policy of the government of B. Mulroney received the name ''politics of continentalism'' in foreign historiography. As a prime measure the new Canadian management suggested enter into the agreement on creation of a zone of free trade in Northern America. The government of Canada acted in September 1985 with the initiative, offering the United States begin negotiations on establishment of a bilateral mode of free trade. Negotiations about creation of a zone of free trade proceeded for more than two years and ended productively. In January 1988 the Canada-U.S. Agreement on free trade (F1A) which provided liquidation of barriers in the bilateral exchange of goods and services, and also joint settlement of trading conflicts and disputes was signed. The steadfast attention neighbours on North American continent did not mean that within B. Mulroney's board Canada has forgotten about other foreign policy directions. Except continental, the priority directions of foreign policy in the official documents of Canada of that time were also European, Pacific and Latin American. The European direction in the Canadian policy of ''Mulroney's era'' dominated with the problems of safety and political issues, while traditionally important trade and economic contacts were set aside. In the second half of the 1980s beginning of the 1990s the basic interests of Canada were connected with the changes in the countries of the Eastern Europe, their gradual democratisation, their loss of the USSR influence. In the Asian-Pacific region policy, basic attention was paid the problems of trade and economic cooperation with Japan, the People's Republic of China and the new industrial countries. The basis of the new Canadian vision of the prospects of political development of the Asian-Pacific region first stated in a statement by Minister of Foreign Affairs of Canada J. Clark on July, 17, 1990 is the thesis about the necessity of a more active multilateral diplomacy in order to melt the ice of the ''cold war '' in this part of the world. According the New Political Strategy approved by the Cabinet in October, 1989 Latin America was also determined a new foreign policy priority. The core of the new Latin American strategy of Ottawa became the task of more active promotion of the Canadian economic interests in the region. In this aspect the most perspective were connections with such countries as Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Venezuela, Uruguay and Peru. As a whole, B. Mulroney's foreign policy can be divided into two periods. At the first stage (before FTA in the beginning of 1989) the overall objective was enter into the Agreement on creation of a free trade zone with the USA. At the second stage B. Mulroney concentrated the attention on other major foreign policy directions balance the external connections of the country whenever possible. Therefore characterizing the foreign policy of Canada in 1984-1993 it is necessary use the concept '' balanced continentalism''.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it