MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W112592727 · doi:10.22323/1.100.0213

Study of Astrophysically Important Excited States of 30S via the 28Si(3He,n\gamma )30S

2011· article· en· W112592727 on OpenAlexafffund
K. Setoodehnia, A. Chen, T. Komatsubara, S. Kubono, Dam Nguyen Binh, J. Chen, T. Hashimoto, T. Hayakawa, Yuji Ishibashi, Yoshiro Ito, D. Kahl, T. Moriguchi, H. Ooishi, Akira Ozawa, T. Shizuma, H. Yamaguchi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of 11th Symposium on Nuclei in the Cosmos — PoS(NIC XI) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Tsukuba
KeywordsPhysicsExcited stateAstrophysicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 29 P(p, γ) 30 S reaction rate strongly affects explosive hydrogen burning in classical novae and type I X-ray bursts, and depends on the structure of proton unbound 30 S states.The rate in the temperature characteristic of nucleosynthesis in novae and X-ray bursts had been previously predicted to be dominated by two low-lying, unobserved, J π = 3 + and 2 + resonances above the proton threshold in 30 S. Since then, two states have been found at 4699(6) keV and 4814(3) keV, which were tentatively assigned to be the 3 + and 2 + states, respectively.To confirm the existence of these two levels and their energies, the structure of 30 S was investigated via an in-beam γ-ray spectroscopy experiment using the 28 Si( 3 He, nγ) 30 S reaction at University of Tsukuba Tandem Accelerator Complex in Japan.This work describes the experimental setup and presents the preliminary results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of 11th Symposium on Nuclei in the Cosmos — PoS(NIC XI)Same topicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallographyFrench-language works237,207