The Palestinian-Arab Minority in Israel, 1948-2000
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Palestinian-Arab Minority in Israel, 1948-2000, by As'ad Ghanem. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2001. xiv + 20 pages. Tables. Appendix to p. 202. Notes to p. 213. Refs. to p. 228. Index to p. 238. $20.95 paper. Reviewed by Amal Jamal Indigenous minorities in democratic nation-states are winning more attention in the political, legal and sociological literature in recent years. More attention is devoted to the relationship between of the land and settler societies. As a result of changes in international politics and the intensification of the process of globalization, the voices of minority nations in settler-colonizing societies such as in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States became more prominent. Despite the tremendous changes taking place in these states regarding their indigenous minorities, the latter are still denied the status of distinct societies with inherent aboriginal rights. Their collective rights are denied on several levels such as land, customary laws, and modes of governance within the settler polity. Comparative studies have pointed out the structure of the state and its dominant ideology as the main factors that influence the status of these minorities. As'ad Ghanem's book, The Palestinian-Arab Minority in Israel, 1948-2000, falls within this theoretical tradition. It is a political history of the indigenous Palestinian minority that remained in Israel after the 1948 war. Ghanem, who is a well-known scholar of this minority, presents a comprehensive study of its political world and examines the impact of the identity of the state on its development. In this sense, the book is another illustration of the distress that indigenous national minorities face in ethnic Therefore, the book is useful not only for those who wish to understand political developments within this specific minority, but also for scholars of comparative politics and for students of Israeli politics. The book follows comparative studies that have demonstrated the tension between indigenous peoples and the logic of modem ethno-national, property-based, settler societies, despite the fact that it does not develop a convincing comparative framework. Ghanem demonstrates the way in which the aspirations of national minorities for a collectively defined self with locality is a problematic mission in non-liberal nation states with ethnically based selective democracy. He makes obvious the way in which the structure and dominant ideology of the Jewish state block any possibility for full equality between Arabs and Jews in Israel. Based on the fundamental link between Palestinians in Israel and the rest of the Palestinian people as one factor and the exclusive Jewish identity of the state of Israel as another factor, Ghanem draws the conclusion that the only viable solution of the predicament of the Arabs in Israel is within a comprehensive solution of the Palestinian question. Therefore, in his view bi-nationalism is the only viable solution for the Israeli-Palestinians conflict. To express this thesis, the book is divided into three main parts. The first part deals with the historical development of the Palestinians, who were turned from a majority in their homeland into minorities in different states. The author devotes his efforts to demonstrate the way in which the establishment of the state of Israel as a Jewish state influenced the Palestinian minority that remained within its borders. In this context, Ghanem distinguishes between two main periods: the 1948-1966 period, in which the Palestinians lived under military rule; and the period 1966 (when the military government was abolished) until the present. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it