"We don’t need another Africville”: Historical Imaginings of Gentrification and Development in Halifax’s North End
Bibliographic record
Abstract
“Renaissance”, “revitalization”, “vibrancy”, and “gentrification” are all terms popularly used to describe the processes currently transforming Halifax’s North End. The longtime neglected, presumed-to-be dangerous, and widely avoided area is now said, by realtors, business owners, and City officials alike, to be a creatively-thriving and socially diverse community, and up-and-coming hotspot for independent business. Home to a large population of Halifax’s “creative class” of artists, musicians, and gays, the historically African Nova Scotian neighbourhood has, over the past decade, undergone a facelift, with some historic homes having been “flipped” three times, and their value sometimes quadrupled. Once-derelict buildings now house luxury condominiums, gourmet restaurants, and boutique retail shops. While some residents celebrate the neighbourhood’s supposed “renaissance,” others bemoan the loss of its rich history and character, perceiving this “revitalization” as “gentrification.” For many newer residents, the influx of new residents, businesses, and vision has inspired a renewed inspiration and hope for the area’s future. Others, cognizant of the area’s deeply-rooted Black culture and longstanding population of African Nova Scotians and Africville descendants, are, however, concerned that the area’s current transformation is pushing out poorer Black and white residents, and, is, in short, “another Africville.” This dissertation emerges out of fourteen months of ethnographic fieldwork that examined how longtime residents are affected by perceived gentrification in Halifax’s North End. I focus on how current social tensions within the area emerge from competing understandings of the area’s history and emergent future. I argue that perceptions towards what some are calling “gentrification” in the North End splinter along the lines of a contentious history – the displacement of Africville. Varying narratives of this history – what I call Narratives of Revitalization and Narratives of Neglect – and its salience today are ultimately shaping whether or not longtime working-class and African Nova Scotian residents imagine themselves in the neighbourhood’s future. I offer a critical, ethnographic, historically-rooted contribution to the gentrification literature that takes the micro-geography of North End Halifax as an historically-unique yet underexplored starting point. My approach offers a more nuanced, locally-grounded and critical perspective on how longtime residents perceive, experience, and respond to neighbourhood change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".