MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1136136811 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-256

Abstract 256: Identification of additional cancers likely to respond to anti-PD-1 therapy (pembrolizumab): Evaluation of PD-L1 expression in a large molecular tumor profiling gene expression database

2015· article· en· W1136136811 on OpenAlexaff
Mark D. Ayers, Michael Nebozhyn, Răzvan Cristescu, Terrill K. McClanahan, Heather A. Hirsch, Jonathan D. Cheng, Andrey Loboda

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsUniversity College of the North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPembrolizumabMedicineLung cancerMelanomaCancerPD-L1OncologyInternal medicineDatabaseCancer researchImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Increased PD-L1 expression has been associated with clinical activity of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies in both melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our objective was to identify other cancers that show increased PD-L1 expression in order to target them for treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab (MK-3475). A collaboration between Merck and the Moffitt Cancer Center was previously established to build a molecular profiling database of >16,000 primary and >3000 metastatic tumors representing 25 different cancers. All tumor samples were profiled on a standardized platform (Affymetrix-Merck Custom GeneChip). For each profiled sample, the PD-L1 cutpoint determined for positivity was defined as the Affymetrix pan-cancer 75th percentile of PD-L1 probes mean. This cutpoint was projected for each specific tumor type and percentages of tumors with PD-L1 above the cutpoint were determined. Cancer indications were rank ordered from highest to lowest percentage of PD-L1 positivity. The analysis identified NSCLC (42% PD-L1+) and melanoma (41% PD-L1+) among the top indications for which single-agent clinical activity of anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapies has been reported. At the bottom of the rankings were prostate cancer (14% PD-L1+) and pancreatic cancer (4% PD-L1+), indications for which limited clinical activity had been reported. This observation confirmed that ranking tumor types by PD-L1 expression across the profiling database could be used to identify other cancers that may respond to anti-PD-1 therapy. Of interest were the tumor types with high PD-L1 expression for which no clinical studies evaluating an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agent had been initiated. Among the indications with high PD-L1 expression were head and neck (59% PD-L1+), urothelial (42% PD-L1+), and triple-negative (TN) breast (29% PD-L1+) cancer; these indications were chosen for evaluation with pembrolizumab in the KEYNOTE-012 study. By accessing cohorts of Asian patients with lung, liver, and gastric cancer and use of similar gene expression microarray profiling, we were able to extrapolate the PD-L1 rankings for these cancers; this resulted in the addition of gastric cancer to KEYNOTE-012. Recently, clinical results from KEYNOTE-012 have shown strong clinical activity for pembrolizumab in all 4 selected indications: head and neck, 20% ORR; urothelial, 21% ORR; TN breast, 18% ORR; and gastric, 31% ORR. The strategy of using a tumor profiling gene expression database for evaluation of PD-L1 expression enabled rapid expansion of pembrolizumab development into indications for which the likelihood of demonstrating clinical activity was high. In turn, this should help accelerate the approval of pembrolizumab for additional indications and, ultimately, provide help to patients suffering from cancer. Citation Format: Mark D. Ayers, Michael Nebozhyn, Razvan Cristescu, Terrill K. McClanahan, Heather A. Hirsch, Jonathan D. Cheng, Andrey Loboda. Identification of additional cancers likely to respond to anti-PD-1 therapy (pembrolizumab): Evaluation of PD-L1 expression in a large molecular tumor profiling gene expression database. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 256. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-256

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→