MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W113650455

Survey of Variable Stability Helicopter Applications in Handling Qualities Research

2013· article· en· W113650455 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Marc Alexander, Marc Höfinger

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace and Aviation Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerospaceAeronauticsEngineeringSystems engineeringControl (management)Variable (mathematics)Operations researchAerospace engineeringComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Applications of Variable Stability Systems (VSS) rotorcraft are motivated by client requirements. Areas may include vehicle and technology development, concept demonstration, regulatory standards investigations, and training programs. A survey of civilian Canadian and European full-authority VSS rotorcraft (NRC Bell 205A Airborne Simulator, NRC Bell 412 Advanced Systems Research Aircraft, and DLR EC 135 Active Control Technology/Flying Helicopter Simulator) presents an overview of facilities, applications, operational challenges, and lessons learned. The breadth of scientific capability highlights the potential of these modern facilities to support development of next generation aeronautical and aerospace products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicAerospace and Aviation TechnologyFrench-language works237,207