MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1140980895 · doi:10.1079/9781845930059.0069

Obtaining information on gastric emptying patterns in horses from appearance of an oral acetaminophen dose in blood plasma.

2009· book-chapter· en· W1140980895 on OpenAlexaff
J.P. Cant, Victoria Walsh, Raymond J. Geor

Bibliographic record

VenueCABI eBooks · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Equine Medical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGastric emptyingAcetaminophenMedicineGastroenterologyInternal medicineAnesthesiaStomach

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rate of passage of nutrients from the stomach to the small intestine is a regulated process that can influence metabolic responses to a meal. Acetaminophen has been used as an indicator of gastric emptying because of its negligible absorption in the stomach and high coefficient of absorption in the proximal small intestine. Seven horses were given an oral dose of 20 mg/kg acetaminophen simultaneously with a 5 ml/kg gastric gavage of water or a 20% glucose solution containing nothing else, tri-acetin, octanoic acid or maize oil. The five different liquid meals were administered on consecutive weeks in a randomized sequence. To identify the pattern of gastric emptying on different meals, several candidate models of gastric emptying and acetaminophen kinetics were evaluated from least squared fits to the 35 sets of acetaminophen concentrations in serial blood samples collected from a jugular catheter. In all models, absorption was assumed to be nil from the stomach and instantaneous from the small intestine. Elimination from the circulation followed first-order kinetics. Assuming continuous, zero-order outflow of acetaminophen from the stomach yielded R2 for fits to the plasma appearance curves that ranged from 0.18 to 0.97 and AIC from 69 to 109. The average±standard deviation (SD) gastric emptying rate was 231±176 mg/min from a dose of 8412±819 mg. Assuming first-order kinetics of acetaminophen outflow relative to gastric contents did not improve the goodness-of-fit. The average±SD emptying rate constant was 0.046±0.042/min. An oscillation in residuals over time from both models was hypothesized to be due to the initial dose intermittently flowing out of the stomach. Two parameters (w and p) were added to the zero-order and first-order emptying models to simulate periodic gushing of gastric contents for w min every p min, where w < p. From the zero-order model, the duration of each gush (w) was estimated to be 52 min, on average, and the period between gushes (p) was 192 min. Representing intermittency of gastric outflow as a sequence of identically spaced pulses resulted, on average, in an 80% increase in the estimate of the rate constant for acetaminophen clearance from plasma. Periodicity parameters for variably intermittent gastric emptying models were obtained from the sign of plasma acetaminophen appearance runs. The zero-order variably intermittent model performed better for meals of glucose plus octanoic acid, whereas the first-order model was superior for the other meals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCABI eBooksSame topicVeterinary Equine Medical ResearchFrench-language works237,207