MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W114340419

Los gitanos en Canadá

2003· article· es· W114340419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ronald Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueI Tchatchipen: lil ada trin tchona rodipen romani = revista trimestral de investigación gitana · 2003
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicRomani and Gypsy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los Vlach son el grupo de gitanos mas numeroso en Canada y son descendientes de los esclavos gitanos de Rumania emancipados en 1865. Todavia hablan un dialecto de la lengua gitana, estan integrados en la sociedad mayoritaria y mantienen su cultura tradicional. Eran un pueblo itinerante, pero con la Segunda Guerra Mundial se asentaron en pueblos y ciudades. Los gitanos de Canada mantienen una cultura mas tradicional y antigua que los europeos, conservan la estructura familiar de sus antepasados y siguen la religion tradicional gitana, basada en el hinduismo y llamada Romaniya . Los romanitchels (unos 20.000) son descendientes de inmigrantes del Reino Unido y hablan un vocabulario formado por palabras en romano e ingles que no entienden los Vlach de Canada o de otras partes. Suelen ser trabajadores autonomos y los jovenes se estan graduando en la universidad. Hay tambien nuevas comunidades de inmigrantes como los Romungere , gitanos hungaros y otros que llegaron despues de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Por ultimo estan los refugiados checos que, sin duda, se integraran en la sociedad como lo hicieron sus predecesores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueI Tchatchipen: lil ada trin tchona rodipen romani = revista trimestral de investigación gitanaSame topicRomani and Gypsy StudiesFrench-language works237,207