Особенности становления и развития гражданского воспитания в Канаде
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article concerns the problems of establishment and development of civic upbringing in Canada. Stages of formation of different approaches to the idea of civic upbringing in American society with taking into account its ethnical inhomogeneity and variety in views on the education system in whole in different historical periods in different provinces of Canada are presented in it. It is considered the changes in the understanding of the civic upbringingand interest to this sphere of upbringing, analysis of the relations of social demands and their influence on the school policy in the context of forming future citizens of the country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.016 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.019 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it