MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W114673003 · doi:10.1007/s10870-005-9007-y

Crystal Structure of bis(O,O′-neopentylene dithiophosphato)nickel(II) Ni[S2 $$\kern2pt\raise12pt\hbox{\vrule height3pt width.5pt depth0pt}\kern-.5pt\raise14pt\hbox{\vrule height.5pt width145pt depth0pt}\hspace*{-147pt}{\rm POCH}_2{\rm CMe}_2{\rm CH}_2{\rm O}\kern-4.2pt\raise12pt\hbox{\vrule height3pt width.5pt depth0pt\kern3pt}]$$ 2 and bis(O,O′-hexylene dithiophosphato)nickel(II) Ni[S2 $$\kern2pt\raise12pt\hbox{\vrule height3pt width.5pt depth0pt}\kern-.5pt\raise14pt\hbox{\vrule height.5pt width164pt depth0pt}\hspace*{-166pt}{\rm POCMe}_2{\rm CH}_2{\rm CHMeO}\kern-4.2pt\raise12pt\hbox{\vrule height3pt width.5pt depth0pt\kern3pt}]$$ 2

2006· article· en· W114673003 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Crystallography · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCrystallographyCombinatoricsMathematicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0260.026
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0280.018
Bibliometrics0.0120.020
Science and technology studies0.0110.013
Scholarly communication0.0080.016
Open science0.0240.014
Research integrity0.0170.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it