Bibliographic record
Abstract
La paix est un des thèmes centraux de la plupart des grandes religions. Dans le christianisme, y compris dans le catholicisme, la paix, dans ses diverses dimensions, a été un objet important de méditation et de prédication. De l'Église primitive à saint Augustin, de saint Thomas d'Aquin aux papes du XXe siècle, la réflexion sur la paix, ainsi que sur la légitime défense et sur la guerre, s'est développée en tenant compte de la fidélité aux textes de la révélation et de la tradition, et en s'adaptant au contexte de l'actualité historique et sociopolitique. Le présent essai étudie un aspect de l'enseignement de l'Église catholique sur les questions de paix, de guerre et de désarmement, à savoir les discours et écrits des papes Benoît XV (1914-1922), Pie XII (1939-1958) Jean XXIII (1958-1963), Paul VI (1963-1978) et Jean-Paul II (1978- ), ainsi que ceux du concile Vatican II (Gaudium et Spes), qui ont traité de ces questions. Il met en lumière le caractère relativement progressiste de cet enseignement officiel du Vatican, alors que dans d'autres domaines la papauté peut sembler prendre des positions plutôt conservatrices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".