MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1151584070 · doi:10.3233/sfc-2004-033

The mechanism of hydrogen embrittlement on the basis of the interaction model of dislocations and hydrogen around a crack tip

2004· article· en· W1151584070 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStrength Fracture and Complexity · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Properties and Failure Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogen embrittlementHydrogenMechanism (biology)Materials scienceEmbrittlementBasis (linear algebra)MetallurgyForensic engineeringEngineeringChemistryPhysicsGeometryCorrosionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mechanisms of dissolvent anodic chemical reaction and hydrogen embrittlement were proposed as stress corrosion cracking mechanics (SCC). The former is feasible for the case of plastic deformation dominant metals and the latter is for high strength metals such as high strength steels. However, in spite of low yield stress, a discontinuous cleavage‐like fracture is sometimes observed during SCC for ductile fcc alloys. In this paper, we proposed stress corrosion cracking model on the basis of interaction of dislocation and hydrogen around a crack tip to predict discontinuous cleavage‐like fracture during SCC for ductile fcc alloys. Furthermore, we conducted numerical analyses using this proposed model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it