MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1151871687 · doi:10.2172/1062519

WOSMIP II- Workshop on Signatures of Medical and Industrial Isotope Production

2011· report· en· W1151871687 on OpenAlexaff
Murray A. Matthews, Pascal Achim, Randy Bell, Ted W. Bowyer, Damien Braekers, Ed Bradley, Budi Briyatmoko, Helena Berglund, Johan Camps, Eduardo Carranza, Fitz Carty, Richard DeCaire, Benoît Deconninck, Lars E. DeGeer, Michael Druce, Judah I. Friese, Robert Hague, Ian Hoffman, Kirill Khrustalev, John C. Lucas, Aleski Mattila, E. Nava, Mika Nikkinin, C. Papastefanou, G. Piefer, Eduard Quintana, Ole Ross, Michel Rotty, Mohammad Sabzian, Paul R. J. Saey, A. A. Sameh, Majid Safari, Michael Schöppner, Petra Siebert, Klaus K. Unger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsHealth CanadaNordion (Canada)
FundersAdvanced Research Projects AgencyComisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Gobierno de ArgentinaBadan Tenaga Nuklir NasionalU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsTreatyProduction (economics)RadionuclideEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringBusinessPolitical scienceLawNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medical and industrial fadioisotopes are fundamental tools used in science, medicine and industry with an ever expanding usage in medical practice where their availability is vital. Very sensitive environmental radionuclide monitoring networks have been developed for nuclear-security-related monitoring [particularly Comprehensive Test-Ban-Treaty (CTBT) compliance verification] and are now operational.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear and radioactivity studiesFrench-language works237,207