MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W11542012 · doi:10.1139/e85-209

Disaster Resistant Communities Initiative: Assessment Of The Pilot Phase - Year 3

2002· article· en· W11542012 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Tricia Wachtendorf, Kathleen J. Tierney, Kristy Kompanik, Rory Connell

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEvaluation and Performance Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFederal Emergency Management Agency
KeywordsGeneral partnershipProgram evaluationImpact assessmentPublic relationsPolitical scienceEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementEngineeringGeographyPublic administration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Elliot Lake-Blind River, Ontario, paleoplacer deposits in the basal Matineda Formation, lowermost member of the 2.25-2.45 Ga old Huronian Supergroup, contain organic matter chemically consistent with kerogen. This substance is also referred to as thucholite. Uranium ores and some gold occur here, and these minerals may be in close association with the kerogen. Two uraniferous and auriferous stratiform kerogens, obtained from the Denison Mines Limited's Denison mine and Rio Algom Limited's Stanleigh mine, have been analyzed by combined high-vacuum pyrolysis--gas chromatography--mass spectrometry and by neutron activation. The reflectances of these samples have also been determined. Related samples containing dispersed kerogen have been examined by backscattered scanning electron microscopy. The polymer-like matrix of the two stratiform kerogens consists of aromatic, alkyl aromatic hydrocarbon, and sulphur moieties and contains 20 and 32% uranium with gold abundances in the parts per billion range. The reflectances of the two kerogens are generally higher than those of the dispersed kerogens; the atomic H/C ratios of the former are approximately 0.6 and approximately 0.4. Backscattered scanning electron microscopy and petrographic observations reveal a complex diagenetic history. Stratigraphic position and supportive analytical data suggest that the stratiform kerogens were probably derived from ancient mats of cyanobacteria, subjected to various radiation-induced reactions, and, at least in part, were affected in a manner similar to the surrounding rocks. The latter experienced physical and chemical diagenetic reactions, which often caused repeated mineral fracturing and led to the local development of authigenic carbonates and feldspar. Some of the chemical nature and history of the stratiform kerogens resemble those of the Witwatersrand carbon seam kerogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.421
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.058 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicEvaluation and Performance AssessmentFrench-language works237,207