MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1154343509

A Review of the Kyoto School: An Introduction

2014· review· en· W1154343509 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ilana Maymind

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Buddhist Ethics · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Kyoto School: An Introduction. By Robert E. Carter. Albany: SUNY, 2013, ISBN: 9781438445427 (paperback), $24.95. In this book, Robert Carter, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at Trent University in Canada, introduces works of four major Japanese philosophers: Nishida Kitaro, Tanabe Hajime, Nishitani Keiji, and Watsuji Tetsuro. His aim is to make present selection accessible even to those who possess either minimal or no knowledge of Kyoto School's thinkers. For former, Carter provides many citations with references for future research. For latter, Carter includes a glossary of terms (173-181) to help novice to navigate text with greater ease. Carter's expertise in synthesis of Eastern and Western ideas enhances accessibility of this text for any Western reader. In addition, his role as a director of Interdisciplinary program at Trent University clearly shows his attuned sensitivity to such cultural idiosyncrasies. To better situate his discussion, Carter begins by providing a brief historical overview and notes that Japan after Meiji Restoration (1868-1912) was transformed from an isolated society into an advanced society accompanied by intellectual development. The Kyoto School highlights this intellectual advancement. The four thinkers discussed in this book adopted an approach that built a foundation for ability to adopt, integrate, but also expand and transform certain Western thoughts into uniquely Japanese system of thought. To address uniqueness of Kyoto School philosophy, Carter recalls James Heisig's insight that Kyoto School is in fact a tradition of interpretations of Nishida's works. This tradition sets itself apart from Western tradition by avoiding any dichotomy between and philosophy. The absence of this dichotomy alerts Western reader to Western nature of term religion itself. Carter points out that so-called religions of East were placed into a predefined category according to imposed Western conceptions. Religion is defined without a typical recourse to belief' but rather in terms of consciousness transformation which is perplexing for Western reader. Carter stipulates his own definition of and how it fits into Japanese delineation by stating: philosophy is, at very least, thinking that both is and consistent, leading to If such thinking leads to self-transformation, then it is in line with what Japanese believe ought to be (6). Borrowing from Carter's definition of philosophy, his exposition of thought of four philosophers discussed in this selection is rigorous and consistent, leading to clarity. In Chapter one, Carter addresses thoughts of Nishida Kitaro. To unpack Japanese thought and make it accessible to Western world, Nishida discusses it in Western terms. The Kyoto school was born out of this initiative. To understand Nishida's thought requires elucidation of his central concepts that, in some cases, relate to Western influences. William James' concept of is one of these influences. Carter demonstrates that Nishida extrapolates James's concept of pure experience by arguing that it is available to anyone engaged in a culture of the meditative art (20). The influence of Henri Bergson's immediate is exemplified in Nishida's articulations of intuition. Nishida is drawn to Bergson's insistence that intuition is more valuable than thinking, which has tendency to fragmentize and de-emphasize one's whole experience. Nishida does not refute intellectual experience but transforms it into a unified experience enhanced by one's intuition that he terms 'intellectual intuition' or direct seeing (28). Yet, Carter warns not to surmise that, for Nishida, pure experience means abandoning intellect. He explains that for Nishida, pure experience is always a unity and its unifying power leads him to adopt metaphysics of becoming, according to which the macrocosm is reflected in microcosm; and reverse also holds (25). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Buddhist EthicsSame topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207