MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Changes in protein turnover during pregnancy in pigs at amino acid intake in excess of requirements

2013· book-chapter· en· W115889716 on OpenAlexaff
Soenke Moehn, M. Rafii, Paul B. Pencharz, Ronald O. Ball

Bibliographic record

VenueWageningen Academic Publishers eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLysineIsoleucinePregnancyTryptophanAmino acidThreonineProtein turnoverInternal medicineEndocrinologyAnimal scienceChemistryBiologyBiochemistryLeucineMedicineProtein biosynthesisSerineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of experiments were completed to determine the amino acid (AA) requirements of pigs for threonine, lysine, tryptophan and isoleucine (Moehn et al., 2011) in early and late pregnancy. The objective of the present analysis was to determine which factors affected protein turnover during pregnancy in pigs when the intake of test AA was above the requirement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWageningen Academic Publishers eBooksSame topicAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207