MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1160678793 · doi:10.3233/oer-2007-7305

Hydraulic-actuation joystick use: A torque, range of motion and electromyographic description

2008· article· en· W1160678793 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOccupational Ergonomics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoystickKinematicsTorqueDeltoid curveRange of motionWork (physics)Physical medicine and rehabilitationMotion (physics)SimulationComputer scienceMedicineEngineeringPhysical therapyPhysicsAnatomyMechanical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this work was to quantify upper limb and joystick kinematics, muscle activation of the prime movers and stabilizers of the shoulder (anterior deltoid, posterior deltoid and upper trapezius) as well as torque exerted by operators of hydraulic-actuation joystick controllers. Dynamic and impact torques were captured through the use of an instrumented joystick. Results indicate that the impact torque (5.36 ± 1.75 N·m for forward motion) sustained as the joystick reaches the end range of motion is substantial and is more than twice that of the operator exerted torque prior to reaching the hard endpoint. EMG data confirm that the upper trapezius is in a state of constant but low level activation, which may be largely attributable to postural demands forced upon the operator by the armrest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it