ЧЕРТЕЖ г. ТЮМЕНИ РУБЕЖА XVII-XVIII вв. И ТОПОГРАФИЯ «ЦАРЕВА ГОРОДИЩА» (ЧИМГИ/ЦЫМГИ-ТУРЫ)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to analysis of the publications regarding one of the early plans of Tyumen of the late XVIIth early XVIIIth century, as well as to a more precise definition of the time and circumstances of its origin and probable authorship, possibly connected with a drawing school of S.U. Remezov's family. Basing on the contents of the plan's inscriptions and by attracting certain famous plans of Tyumen and descriptions of Chimgi/Tsimgi-Tura fortified settlement of the XVIIIth mid-XIXth centuries, the author presents the topography of the town and Tsar fortified settlement also called Kuchum) as part of Tsimgi/Tura, supplied with their fortification and parameters. Correlation with the size of the Kremlin and the trading quarter of Tyumen at the early XVIIth and the borderline of the XVIIth-XVIIIth centuries allows to picture a large scale of this archaeological site of the mediaeval Tyumen, now lost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".