MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1162199193 · doi:10.1142/s0219199716500218

Third-order differential equations and local isometric immersions of pseudospherical surfaces

2016· article· en· W1162199193 on OpenAlexafffund
Tarcísio Castro Silva, Niky Kamran

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Contemporary Mathematics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsMathematicsIntegrable systemPartial differential equationMathematical analysisConservation lawDifferential equationPure mathematicsMathematical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The class of differential equations describing pseudospherical surfaces enjoys important integrability properties which manifest themselves by the existence of infinite hierarchies of conservation laws (both local and nonlocal) and the presence of associated linear problems. It thus contains many important known examples of integrable equations, like the sine-Gordon, Liouville, KdV, mKdV, Camassa–Holm and Degasperis–Procesi equations, and is also home to many new families of integrable equations. Our paper is concerned with the question of the local isometric immersion in E3 of the pseudospherical surfaces defined by the solutions of equations belonging to the class introduced by Chern and Tenenblat [Pseudospherical surfaces and evolution equations, Stud. Appl. Math. 74 (1986) 55–83]. In the case of the sine-Gordon equation, it is a classical result that the second fundamental form of the immersion depends only on a jet of finite order of the solution of the partial differential equation. A natural question is therefore to know if this remarkable property extends to equations other than the sine-Gordon equation within the class of differential equations describing pseudospherical surfaces. In a pair of earlier papers [N. Kahouadji, N. Kamran and K. Tenenblat, Second-order equations and local isometric immersions of pseudo-spherical surfaces, to appear in Comm. Anal. Geom., arXiv: 1308.6545; Local isometric immersions of pseudo-spherical surfaces and evolution equations, in Hamiltonian Partial Differential Equations and Applications, eds. P. Guyenne, D. Nichols and C. Sulem, Fields Institute Communications, Vol. 75 (Springer-Verlag, 2015), pp. 369–381], it was shown that this property fails to hold for all [Formula: see text]th-order evolution equations [Formula: see text] and all other second-order equations of the form [Formula: see text], except for the sine-Gordon equation and a special class of equations for which the coefficients of the second fundamental form are universal, that is functions of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] which are independent of the choice of solution [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we consider third-order equations of the form [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], which describe pseudospherical surfaces with the Riemannian metric given in [T. Castro Silva and K. Tenenblat, Third order differential equations describing pseudospherical surfaces, J. Differential Equations 259 (2015) 4897–4923]. This class contains the Camassa–Holm and Degasperis–Procesi equations as special cases. We show that whenever there exists a local isometric immersion in E3 for which the coefficients of the second fundamental form depend on a jet of finite order of [Formula: see text], then these coefficients are universal in the sense of being independent on the choice of solution [Formula: see text]. This result further underscores the special place that the sine-Gordon equations seem to occupy amongst integrable partial differential equations in one space variable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Contemporary MathematicsSame topicNonlinear Waves and SolitonsFrench-language works237,207