MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1162625643 · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.043813

Realization of arbitrary discrete unitary transformations using spatial and internal modes of light

2015· article· en· W1162625643 on OpenAlexafffund
Ish Dhand, Sandeep K. Goyal

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersArmy Research OfficeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRealization (probability)Unitary transformationUnitary stateBeam splitterUnitary matrixTransformation (genetics)UnitarityMatrix (chemical analysis)Transformation matrixTransposePhysicsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsEigenvalues and eigenvectors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Any lossless transformation on ${n}_{s}$ spatial and ${n}_{p}$ internal modes of light can be described by an ${n}_{s}{n}_{p}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{n}_{s}{n}_{p}$ unitary matrix, but there is no known procedure to effect an arbitrary ${n}_{s}{n}_{p}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{n}_{s}{n}_{p}$ unitary matrix on light in ${n}_{s}$ spatial and ${n}_{p}$ internal modes. We devise an algorithm to realize an arbitrary discrete unitary transformation on the combined spatial and internal degrees of freedom of light. Our realization uses beam splitters and operations on internal modes to effect arbitrary linear transformations. The number of beam splitters required to realize a unitary transformation is reduced as compared to existing realization by a factor ${n}_{p}^{2}/2$ at the cost of increasing the number of internal optical elements by a factor of 2. Our algorithm thus enables the optical implementation of higher dimensional unitary transformations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207