L'interdiction de fumer en établissement de détention canadien : le vécu des hommes incarcérés
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La présente étude a comme objectif de comprendre comment les détenus se sont adaptés à l’interdiction complète de fumer dans les établissements carcéraux canadiens. À partir d’entrevues qualitatives menées auprès de dix-sept hommes incarcérés dans divers établissements de détention canadiens, nous avons analysé le vécu des reclus soumis à cette nouvelle réglementation. Il ressort de nos analyses que le tabac permet aux détenus d’amoindrir les souffrances liées à l’emprisonnement, d’où l’adaptation individuelle et collective quant au contournement de la politique antitabac. De plus, la réglementation sur le tabac a des répercussions considérables sur le caractère total des institutions carcérales. La perte d’un droit qui avait été acquis depuis plusieurs décennies a créé une augmentation des mesures de contrôle, des privations et des tensions au sein du milieu carcéral.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".