MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1163949136 · doi:10.3233/ajw-150007

Prediction of Rain in Bihar, India, Based on Historical Rain Data

2015· article· en· W1163949136 on OpenAlexaff
Anand M. Sharan

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Water Environment and Pollution · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceClimatologyGeographyMeteorologyPhysical geographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work the prediction of rain is based on average of three methods. In these methods, historical  rain data of Bihar are selected for projection. These methods take into account the trends in rain pattern also.  The predicted results are quite close to the actual rain data for the year 2013. Based on this success, the forecast  was made in December 2013 for the year 2014. This prediction was checked on September 1, 2014, and it was  found that the predicted and the actual rainfall data for June, July and August of 2014 were close.  The advantage of this approach is that it gives farmers far more time than they get presently when preliminary  predictions are announced by India Meteorological Department in April for each monsoon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Journal of Water Environment and PollutionSame topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207