MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1164674232 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.070

Evolution of Bulk c-Si Properties during the Processing of GaP/c-Si Heterojunction Cell

2015· article· en· W1164674232 on OpenAlexaff
Renaud Varache, Maxime Darnon, Médéric Descazeaux, M. Martin, T. Baron, D. Muñoz

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsHeterojunctionAmorphous siliconSiliconEpitaxyAmorphous solidNanocrystalline siliconMetalorganic vapour phase epitaxyAnnealing (glass)Gallium phosphideSolar cellCrystalline siliconNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)ChemistryCrystallographyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the limitations of current amorphous silicon/crystalline silicon heterojunction solar cells are optical losses in the amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) layers that limit the short circuit current. In this work, we propose to replace amorphous silicon layers by a thin crystalline gallium phosphide (GaP) layer in heterojunctions solar cells. We show that the better transparency of GaPcompared to a-Si:H promises gain in the UV region. However, the annealing in the MOCVD chamber before GaP growth that is necessary for high quality GaP epitaxial growth degrades the bulk silicon minority carrier lifetime. This degradation is attributed to fast diffusing species and can be overcome by a gettering process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207