MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1164674232 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.070

Evolution of Bulk c-Si Properties during the Processing of GaP/c-Si Heterojunction Cell

2015· article· en· W1164674232 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsHeterojunctionAmorphous siliconSiliconEpitaxyAmorphous solidNanocrystalline siliconMetalorganic vapour phase epitaxyAnnealing (glass)Gallium phosphideSolar cellCrystalline siliconNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)ChemistryCrystallographyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the limitations of current amorphous silicon/crystalline silicon heterojunction solar cells are optical losses in the amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) layers that limit the short circuit current. In this work, we propose to replace amorphous silicon layers by a thin crystalline gallium phosphide (GaP) layer in heterojunctions solar cells. We show that the better transparency of GaPcompared to a-Si:H promises gain in the UV region. However, the annealing in the MOCVD chamber before GaP growth that is necessary for high quality GaP epitaxial growth degrades the bulk silicon minority carrier lifetime. This degradation is attributed to fast diffusing species and can be overcome by a gettering process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it