MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Interplay between Catalysts and Substrates for Activity of Class Ib Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases and Implications for Pharmacology

2015· review· en· W1166129206 on OpenAlexaff
Preyesh Stephen, Sheng‐Xiang Lin, Richard Giegé

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAminoacyl tRNA synthetaseTransfer RNAChemistryPharmacologyBiochemistryComputational biologyBiologyRNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase:transfer RNA (aaRS:tRNA) systems became recently essential targets in molecular medicine, because perturbed recognition of cognate tRNAs by aaRSs and poor precision in tRNA aminoacylation do not guarantee accurate protein biosynthesis, thus leading to diseases. Sets of identity determinants situated at particular zones of tRNA are responsible for functional accuracy. Recent work in X-ray crystallography has revealed various snapshots of aaRS:ligand complexes which represent the stages required for aminoacylation. Here we focus on a small group of class I aaRSs conserved in evolution, the ArgRSs, GluRSs, GlnRSs, and atypical LysRSs found mostly in Archaea and in a few Bacteria, that catalyze amino acid activation only in the presence of their cognate tRNAs. Structural and functional features of these aaRSs, ranked in subclass Ib, together with their peculiar mode of tRNA recognition and identity expression are reviewed and compared. Strategies to inhibit class Ib aaRS:tRNA aminoacylation systems, their dysfunction leading to human diseases, and the implications for pharmacology are outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Topics in Medicinal ChemistrySame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207