MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1168726229 · doi:10.1038/srep13205

The growth scale and kinetics of WS2 monolayers under varying H2 concentration

2015· article· en· W1168726229 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Electrical, Communications and Cyber SystemsYork UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMonolayerSubstrate (aquarium)Scanning electron microscopeTungsten disulfideChemical vapor depositionEtching (microfabrication)SulfurMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)KineticsCrystallographyHydrogenTransition metalTungstenChemical engineeringChemistryNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)MetallurgyCatalysisOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The optical and electronic properties of tungsten disulfide monolayers (WS2) have been extensively studied in the last few years, yet growth techniques for WS2 remain behind other transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) such as MoS2. Here we demonstrate chemical vapor deposition (CVD) growth of continuous monolayer WS2 films on mm(2) scales and elucidate effects related to hydrogen (H2) gas concentration during growth. WS2 crystals were grown by reduction and sulfurization of WO3 using H2 gas and sulfur evaporated from solid sulfur powder. Several different growth formations (in-plane shapes) were observed depending on the concentration of H2. Characterization using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed etching of the SiO2 substrate at low concentrations of H2 and in the presence of an Ar carrier gas. We attribute this to insufficient reduction of WO3 during growth. High H2 concentrations resulted in etching of the grown WS2 crystals after growth. The two dimensional X-ray diffraction (2D XRD) pattern demonstrates that the monolayer WS2 was grown with the (004) plane normal to the substrate, showing that the WS2 conforms to the growth substrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it