MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1168863004 · doi:10.15304/dereito.24.1.2372

Le notariat au Québec: rupture et continuité dans la tradition civiliste

2015· article· fr· W1168863004 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Naiví Chikoc Barreda

Bibliographic record

VenueDereito revista xurídica da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Social Philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesContext (archaeology)Political scienceLawPhilosophyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans la tradition civiliste, le notaire est un officier public et un professionnel du droit qui reçoit de l’État une parcelle de son autorité pour l’authentification de faits et d’actes juridiques. Or, l’institution notariale présente au Québec depuis 1621 assume à l’intérieur du système civiliste des traits caractéristiques distinctifs en raison du contexte particulier dans lequel elle a évolué. La conquête de la Nouvelle-France par les Anglais en 1760 laissa le notariat québécois orphelin au milieu d’un continent dominé par les principes de la common law. Ainsi détaché de ses racines françaises et influencé par l’entourage nord-américain, le notariat québécois revêt une physionomie particulière qui marque la rupture et la continuité de la tradition civiliste en territoire canadien.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.15304/dereito.24.1.2372

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDereito revista xurídica da Universidade de Santiago de CompostelaSame topicLegal and Social PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207