MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W117153111

Принципы формирования содержания программ канадской допрофессиональной туристической подготовки

2013· article· ru· W117153111 on OpenAlex
Наталія Жорняк

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Томского государственного педагогического университета · 2013
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicHospitality and Tourism Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismAffect (linguistics)PedagogyPublic relationsPolitical scienceEngineering ethicsSociologyEngineeringLawCommunication
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article considers the experience of forming the content of pre-professional programs in the Canadian tourism training. The characteristics of the conditions that affect the content of the tourism training programs are given. The way, in which they are carried out in practice in Canadian schools, is analysed, and the peculiarities, which are given special attention to, are dealt with. The reasonable directions of their use in the national education are dwelt upon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.340
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.014
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.132

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it