MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W117237829

GLOBALIZATION IN THE NORTH AMERICAN REGION: TOWARD RENEGOTIATION OF CULTURAL SPACE

2004· article· en· W117237829 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ratna Ghosh

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation in Rural Contexts
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationConstructiveEthnologyHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArtLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT. There are sharp differences in the economic, educational and political conditions among the NAFTA countries. This paper focuses on the difference in cultural and value orientations in Mexico, Canada and the United States. Education is increasingly market driven, which poses a challenge in balancing the integration of education with international standards while still maintaining distinctive cultures. A conceptual model is proposed as a constructive approach for socio-cultural integration, and its educational implications are discussed. MONDIALISATION EN AMERIQUE DU NORD: VERS LA RENEGOCIATION DE L'ESPACE CULTUREL RESUME. Les conditions economiques, pedagogiques et politiques different grandement au sein des pays de l'ALENA. Ce document met l'accent sur la difference d'orientation sur les plans de la culture et des valeurs au Mexique, au Canada et aux Etats-Unis. L'enseignement est de plus en plus axe sur le marche, ce qui pose le defi d'integrer l'enseignement aux normes internationales tout en maintenant l'identite des cultures distinctes. Un modele conceptuel est propose comme approche constructive a l'integration socioculturelle et ses incidences au niveau de l'enseignement sont abordees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.224
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGillSame topicEducation in Rural ContextsFrench-language works237,207