MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W117247318

The Fiction of No Friction: A User Skills Approach to Cognitive Lock-In

2002· article· en· W117247318 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kyle B. Murray, Gerald Häubl

Bibliographic record

VenueAlexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInnovatorCorporationEndowmentManagementLock (firearm)EngineeringSociologyPsychologyEntrepreneurshipPolitical scienceMechanical engineeringEconomicsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consumer Studies (www.iocs.org), and Allaire Corporation. This research also benefited from a Petro-Canada Young Innovator Award and a Nova Corporation Faculty Fellowship, awarded to Gerald Haubl, as well as from the Poole PhD Endowment Fellowship, the University of Alberta School of Business PhD Fellowship, and the Province of Alberta Graduate Fellowship awarded to Kyle Murray. The authors wish to thank Terry Elrod for his valuable comments. Correspondence should be addressed to the first author. The Fiction of No Friction: A User Skills Approach to Cognitive Lock-In

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen)Same topicConsumer Market Behavior and PricingFrench-language works237,207