MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1175362930

Radiation and Cisplatin activation of EBV in nasopharyngeal cancer: Understanding the oncolytic potential of EBV

2006· article· en· W1175362930 on OpenAlexaff
Marie C. Chia, Abby Leung, Tiffaney Krushel, Nehad M. Alajez, Carlo Bastianutto, Fei‐Fei Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral-associated cancers and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBZLF1Lytic cycleTransactivationNasopharyngeal carcinomaCancer researchCisplatinEpstein–Barr virusBiologyChromatin immunoprecipitationOncolytic virusGene expressionMolecular biologyGeneVirusImmunologyMedicineRadiation therapyGeneticsHerpesviridaeChemotherapyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

823 Introduction: The Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) is highly associated with Nasopharyngeal Cancer (NPC) where it exists in a state of latency (type II), expressing a limited number of genes. Upon stress activation however, the EBV profile switches to a lytic phase, associated with the expression of several critical EBV genes including BRLF1 and BZLF1. The events regulating this switch are not completely understood, but insights into this process may lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies given the intimate relationship between EBV and NPC. Materials & Methods: The EBV positive cell line C666-1 was treated with ionizing radiation, RT (15Gy) and/or Cisplatin (50ug/mL). Gene expression data was determined using quantitative real-time PCR. Dominant-negative experiments were performed using dN-NF-YA (kindly provided by R. Manotvani) and over-expression analysis used the pNF-YA construct (Origene). Transactivation ability of NF-Y was determined on nuclear lysates using ELISA-based analyses (Active Motif). Chromatin immunoprecipiation (ChIP) experiments were performed using NF-YA and NF-YB antibodies (Active Motif, Santa Cruz) and primers designed for the appropriate NF-Y consensus regions. Results: C666-1 cells were treated with RT and/or Cisplatin, and a time and dose-dependent activation of BRLF1 and BZLF1 were observed. Increases in BRLF1 were observed as early as two hours post-treatment, followed by BZLF1 expression between 8 and 24 hours. The expression of both lytic genes increased in a time-dependent manner to 72 hours post-treatment. These same treatments were also associated with the increased expression of the transcription factor Nuclear Factor Y (NF-Y) and immediate nuclear transactivation. Introduction of dN-NF-YA significantly reduced BRLF1 expression after RT and Cisplatin treatment by 5-fold. Consistent with these observations, overexpression of NF-YA resulted in at least a 10-fold increase in both BRLF1 and BZLF1 expression. In silico analysis reveals that putative NF-Y consensus binding sequences are located in the promoter region of BZLF1 and BRLF1, suggesting a potential transcriptional regulatory role of NF-Y. Preliminary results using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) confirm the physical interaction between NF-Y and the promoter region of critical EBV lytic genes. Conclusion: Taken together, these data suggest the novel finding that NF-Y appears to be a major mediator of the EBV stress response in switching from a latent to lytic state. Manipulations which could increase NF-Y expression, thereby facilitating the expression of lytic EBV genes in human NPC, might offer a potential therapeutic strategy to enhance NPC response to RT and Cisplatin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicViral-associated cancers and disordersFrench-language works237,207