The experiential approach and the values attributed to woodland vacations by tourists.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article traite des valeurs que des touristes provenant de milieux urbains accordent à la villégiature en forêt. Les résultats de cette recherche exploratoire proviennent d’entrevues effectuées dans des groupes de discussion auprès d’une douzaine de touristes. C’est à partir de l’approche expérientielle qui propose que les valeurs se forment à travers l’interaction entre l’objet et l’individu que nous avons relevé cinq valeurs propres à la villégiature en forêt. Les valeurs accordées à un séjour de villégiature en forêt sont les valeurs utilitaire, hédoniste, esthétique, sociale et de liberté. Ce type de villégiature permet notamment aux individus d’accéder aux loisirs et au repos, de vivre des sensations de plaisir, de retrouver des membres de leur entourage, d’apprécier le paysage et de se détacher du quotidien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".