MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1182342855 · doi:10.3141/2474-18

Implementation of a Strain-Based Policy for Managing Weight Restrictions during the Spring

2015· article· en· W1182342855 on OpenAlexaffabout
Leonnie Kavanagh, Ahmed Shalaby

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLimitingSpring (device)Strain (injury)RutDuration (music)Structural engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringAsphaltComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A strain-based concept for managing spring weight restrictions (SWRs) on load levels and duration for low-volume roads was developed and applied to a low-volume road in Manitoba, Canada. Local fatigue and rutting damage models were used to predict limiting failure strains during the spring. The limiting failure strains were compared with predicted strains at SWR loads during the spring. On the basis of the results, the strain-based concept can be used to manage SWR load levels and the duration of SWR during the spring. Analysis of limiting failure strain should be applied to other pavements to verify the findings. For the strain-based concept to be practical, use of the Minnesota thawing index procedure based on climatic data is recommended for estimating the start of the SWR period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardSame topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207