MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1183387720

Reproductive biology and floral variation in the endangered Braya longii and threatened B. fernaldii (Brassicaceae) : implications for conservation management of rare plants

2002· dissertation· en· W1183387720 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kimberley A. Parsons

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2002
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany and Plant Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThreatened speciesEndangered speciesOutcrossingBiologyBrassicaceaePopulationEcologyHabitat
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The closely related, endangered Braya longii and threatened Braya fernaldii (Brassicaceae) are endemic to the limestone barrens of the Great Northern Peninsula of Newfoundland. This project determines potential breeding systems, levels of population differentiation, potential hybridization between these species and implications for conservation management. Morphological species differences are also summarized to ensure proper identification of new populations. Results indicate field identification using only single morphological characters is insufficient to unambiguously identify species. Both species were found to be primarily autogamous but B. longii has a greater potential for outcrossing than B. fernaldii. Cleistogamy was found to occur within some populations of B. fernaldii, but not in B. longii. Evidence of population differentiation in floral morphology was found for both species and potential hybridization was indicated by floral morphology and hand-pollinations. The results of this study provide guidance for potential conservation management tools and must be addressed before reintroduction and population restoration are implemented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207