Crystal Chemistry of Zircon and Monazite: Crystal Structure, Major and Trace Elements, and Radiation Damage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the crystal structural variations and their relation to chemical composition and radiation effects of detrital zircon and monazite, and the elevated radionuclide concentrations in zircon and monazite-rich heavy mineral deposits in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Several experimental techniques such as electron-probe micro-analysis (EPMA), single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD), synchrotron high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction (HRPXRD), gamma-ray spectroscopy with hyper-purity germanium detector (GRS-HPGe), and gravity, magnetic, and electrical mineral separators have been used to carry out this research. In addition, several software programs including SHELX, WinGX, GSAS-EXGUI, Crystal Maker, and Gamma-W have also been applied for data processing and analysis. The unit-cell parameters for the eight zircon samples vary linearly with increasing unit-cell volume, V. The detrital zircon sample 7:PIF (Perry Island Formation) from the Canadian Arctic Islands has the lowest unit-cell parameters and bond distances, ideal stoichiometric composition, and is unaffected by α-radiation damage. Thus, sample 7:PIF is chemically and structurally pure zircon. Sample 8 from Jemaa, Nigeria shows the significant change throughout the synchrotron HRPXRD trace and reveals the largest structural parameters after the Rietveld refinement. Samples 1 to 7 show very good correlations between the V and Zr and Si apfu contents. They received α-radiation doses which are lower than ~3.5 × 1015 α-decay events/mg. Substitutions of other cations at the Zr and Si sites control the variations of structural parameters for samples 1 to 7. The sample 5 shows relatively long unit-cell parameters and bond distances because the Zr site accommodates other cations that have higher ionic radii. Geological age increases the radiation doses in zircon and it is also related to the V. The a and b unit-cell parameters for monazite samples 1, 2, 3, and 4 vary systematically with V, although each monazite sample contains several cations that occupy the Ce/Sm site in the monazite structure. However, the c unit-cell parameter shows limited variation. The increase or decrease of the average distances is dependent on the type of cations occupying the Ce site in the monazite structure but the average distances is independent showing a rigid body behavior obtained with SCXRD and EPMA. The HRPXRD data shows pegmatitic Ce-dominated monazite contains multiple phases and Sm-dominated monazite has a single phase. The multiple phases in sample 2a may not be crystallized at the same time because the average distances differ. Redistribution of Ce and P site cations with Y in sample 2a is also indicative late recrystallization of phases 2a and 2c. As the pegmatitic monazite sample 2a received a high amount of alpha-radiation doses, the phase changes occur for the effects of alpha-radiation. The activity concentrations for 238U, 235U, 232Th and 40K in bulk beach sand samples are found to be considerably high and positively correlated to the amount of heavy minerals present in the sands. In the separated mineral fractions, the highest activity concentration was found in the zircon followed by garnet, rutile, ilmenite and magnetite fractions. The determination of the radium activity, several radiation hazard indices, and absorbed and effective gamma doses allow to assess the related exposure of the coastal environment and the local population to elevated radioactivity. It becomes evident from the present study that if raw sands or mineral fractions mined in the study area are used for building purposes or industrial use, their activity concentrations have to be considered from a radio-ecological perspective and if mining and processing of the minerals is being considered, U and Th may become strategically significant by-products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".