Measurement of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si1.gif" overflow="scroll"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">WZ</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ℓ</mml:mi></mml:math>cross section and limits on anomalous triple gauge couplings in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si2.gif" overflow="scroll"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math>collisions at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si3.gif" overflow="scroll"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.96</mml:mn><mml:mtext>TeV</mml:mtext></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a new measurement of the WZ → ℓ ν ℓ ℓ ( ℓ = e , μ ) cross section and limits on anomalous triple gauge couplings. Using 4.1 fb −1 of integrated luminosity of p p ¯ collisions at s = 1.96 TeV , we observe 34 WZ candidate events with an estimated background of 6.0 ± 0.4 events. We measure the WZ production cross section to be 3.89 − 0.90 + 1.07 pb , in good agreement with the standard model prediction. We find no evidence for anomalous WWZ couplings and set 95% C.L. limits on the coupling parameters, − 0.077 < λ Z < 0.093 and − 0.029 < Δ κ Z < 0.080 in the HISZ parameterization for a Λ = 2 TeV form factor scale. These are the best limits to date obtained from the direct measurement of the WWZ vertex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".