Жанр как основополагающая категория формирования литературного процесса (к вопросу о становлении жанра рассказа в финно-угорских литературах Среднего Поволжья в начале ХХ века)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author of the article proves that a new concept of research of the formation and development of national literatures can be based on the idea of the genres history. The development of the story genre in Finno-Ugric literatures of the Average Volga region in the first quarter of the XX century enables to note the episodes, which are described as various types of communications of actually epic genres with an art sketch. Therefore the way of development of the story genre in the Finno-Ugric prose of the beginning of the century appears in the form of « a broken line », consisting of pieces of «the pure form » (story) and multilayered synthetic structures (a sketch, the story-sketch, the sketch). It proves an urgency of studying the problem of the genres development, with its modifications, interactions and diffusions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it