Modelli di circolazione giurisprudenziale: la libertà di espressione e l hate speech nella giurisprudenza della Namibia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El articulo se ocupa del analisis de la jurisprudencia namibiana sobre libertad de expresion. Tras una breve descripcion del ordenamiento constitucional vigente en Namibia, y en particular de la nueva Constitucion, el estudio se desarrolla por medio del analisis de las decisiones mas importantes bien de la High Court, bien de la Supreme Court sobre el contenido esencial y los limites de este derecho fundamental que ha sido interpretado por estos tribunales a traves de la citacion de decisiones judiciales extranjeras. Asi, entre las jurisdicciones extranjeras mas citadas, se destacan las Cortes Supremas de Canada y de India y el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. En particular, el enfoque de este articulo se centra sobre la interpretacion judicial de la reglamentacion de los discursos del odio en el ordenamiento constitucional namibiano que incluso se ha desarrollado a traves de muchas referencias al derecho extranjero.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".