MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Complementary Utility of Multislice Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography for Detection of High-Grade Lesions in Patients with Negative Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

2008· article· en· W119015091 on OpenAlexaff
Gaurav Gupta, Azam Anwar, Michael D. Brophey, Jeffrey Schussler

Bibliographic record

VenueBaylor University Medical Center Proceedings · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsWorkplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial perfusion imagingCoronary artery diseaseComputed tomographic angiographyRevascularizationRadiologyPerfusionPerfusion scanningCardiologyCoronary angiographyMultislice computed tomographyComputed tomographicInternal medicineStress testing (software)AngiographyComputed tomographyMyocardial infarctionComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a highly sensitive and specific test for noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Therefore, in patients with negative MPI results, further noninvasive testing is usually not pursued. We report a series of patients with negative MPI results in whom 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography accurately predicted flow-limiting coronary lesions requiring subsequent revascularization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBaylor University Medical Center ProceedingsSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207